Online ISSN: 2515-8260

WARM ISCHEMIA TIME IN ROBOTIC DONOR NEPHRECTOMY (LIVING) VS OPEN DONOR NEPHRECTOMY (LIVING) AND OUTCOME.

Main Article Content

Dr. Vinay Mahendra, Dr. Palash Saha, Dr. Joy Bhadra Roy, Dr. Tridibesh Mandal, Dr. Swati Khatri

Abstract

Introduction: Kindly transplant is the most valuable surgery to improve the survival and change in life style quality in the end stage of renal dises in living robotic donor nephrectomy reduces waiting time for resipent patient and avoid more Hemodialysis. Aims: The aim of the study is to analyze the effect of graft kidney short and long time outcome. After Robotic living donor nephrectomy with minimal hospital stay. Materials and Methods: This study conducted on patient admitted for renal transplant both the donor and resipent posted for OT for living robotic donor nephrectomy and also posted for open donor nephrectomy in Apollo malty specialty Hospital Kolkata all patient were older than 20 years both the donor and resipent in the study analysis of robotic donor nephrectomy of warm ischemia time on delayed graft function rate of decline in in serum creatinine in the first 10 days and change of creatinine at 3 month Acute and delayed graft rejection. Result: It nephrectomy Robotic (Living) is a safe procedure immediate kidney allograft function was good with less chance injury in graft kidney, vein, artery, ureter it was performed successfully in all case with a short surgical time with also low morbidity and 0% moriality and minimal hospital stay very less chance in acute and delayed graft kidney rejection with grate cosmetic value. Conclusion: In our study we found that, In nephrectomy Robotic (Living) was better procedure than open donor nephrectomy (Living).

Article Details