• Register
  • Login

European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine

  • Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Subject
    • Keyword Index
    • Author Index
    • Indexing Databases XML
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Peer Review Process
    • News
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
Advanced Search

Notice

As part of Open Journals’ initiatives, we create website for scholarly open access journals. If you are responsible for this journal and would like to know more about how to use the editorial system, please visit our website at https://ejournalplus.com or
send us an email to info@ejournalplus.com

We will contact you soon

  1. Home
  2. Volume 7, Issue 8
  3. Authors

Online ISSN: 2515-8260

Volume7, Issue8

A Comparative Study Of U-Shaped Assembly System And Straight-Line Assembly System In Terms Of Cycle Rate And Efficiency By Using Delmia Quest Simulation

    Siti Norhafiza Binti Abdul Razak Imran Adil Bin Adnan

European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2020, Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages 3758-3767

  • Show Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

Since the progression of Industrial Revolution 4.0 (IR4.0), most machines in the assembly and production line have transformed into automated system and can be wirelessly controlled. In an Automated Assembly Line System (AALS), there are many different physical systems, classified according to its configurations. The two most used Automated Assembly Line Systems are U-Shaped Assembly System(USAS) and Straight-Line Assembly System(SLAS). Both configurations come with their own advantages and disadvantages which needs to be considered when designing an automated assembly line system. However, no empirical or experimental research has been done on the effects of using U-Shaped Assembly System compared to Straight-Line Assembly System in terms of Cycle Rate, Rc and overall system Efficiency, E. Therefore, this study aims to analyse and compare the two most used assembly line configurations. The analysis and comparison are achieved through findings from Microsoft Excel Calculations and simulation in Delmia Quest. The study attempts to choose the best assembly line configurations, examined in terms of the Cycle Rate, Rc and Efficiency, E. From the study conducted, the study finds the best assembly system layout in terms of Cycle Rate, Rc and Efficiency, E to be the U-Shaped Assembly System.
Keywords:
    Assembly line configurations Cycle Rate Efficiency Delmia Quest Microsoft Excel Straight-Line Assembly System U-Shaped Assembly System
  • PDF (316 K)
  • XML
(2021). A Comparative Study Of U-Shaped Assembly System And Straight-Line Assembly System In Terms Of Cycle Rate And Efficiency By Using Delmia Quest Simulation. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7(8), 3758-3767.
Siti Norhafiza Binti Abdul Razak; Imran Adil Bin Adnan. "A Comparative Study Of U-Shaped Assembly System And Straight-Line Assembly System In Terms Of Cycle Rate And Efficiency By Using Delmia Quest Simulation". European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7, 8, 2021, 3758-3767.
(2021). 'A Comparative Study Of U-Shaped Assembly System And Straight-Line Assembly System In Terms Of Cycle Rate And Efficiency By Using Delmia Quest Simulation', European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7(8), pp. 3758-3767.
A Comparative Study Of U-Shaped Assembly System And Straight-Line Assembly System In Terms Of Cycle Rate And Efficiency By Using Delmia Quest Simulation. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2021; 7(8): 3758-3767.
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • Harvard
  • Vancouver
  • Article View: 150
  • PDF Download: 182
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Telegram
Journal Information

Publisher:

Email:  editor.ejmcm21@gmail.com

  • Home
  • Glossary
  • News
  • Aims and Scope
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap

 

For Special Issue Proposal : editor.ejmcm21@gmail.com

This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)

Powered by eJournalPlus